2004   |   2003   |   2002   |   2001   |   2000   |   1999   |   1997

2004

• 2/13/2004, Chronicle of Higher Education, "Head of Civil-Rights Panel Denounces Affirmative-Action Survey Sent Out on Panel's Letterhead," by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 2/13/2004, Michigan Daily, "Editorial: Troubling numbers," by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 2/12/2004, Ann Arbor News, "Students explain why U-M's not in their plans," by Liz Cobbs and Patty Maher.
  
  
• 2/11/2004, Detroit Free Press, "Enrollments rise in U.S. colleges," by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 2/10/2004, Ann Arbor News, "U-M: Fewer minorities applying," by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 2/10/2004, Chicago Tribune, "Applications by minorities fall at U. of M.," by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 2/10/2004, Detroit News, "U-M loses minority applicants," by Brad Heath.
  
  
• 2/10/2004, Detroit Free Press, "U-M sees dive in minority applications," by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 2/10/2004, Detroit Free Press, "Editorial: U-M Admissions," by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 2/10/2004, Jewish World Review, "Minorities shy away from University of Michigan after ruling," by The News Staff.
  
  
• 2/10/2004, Michigan Daily, "Applications from minorities drop in '03-04," by Alison Go.
  
  
• 2/9/2004, Associated Press, "Applications down under U-M's new undergrad policy," by Sarah Freeman.
  
  
• 2/9/2004, Associated Press, "Minority Applications Drop at Michigan," by The Associated Press.
  
  
• 2/1/2004, The News Tribune, "Editorial: No need for race as a factor in admissions," by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 1/30/2004, Chronicle of Higher Education, "New Pressure Put on Colleges to End Legacies in Admissions," by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 1/28/2004, Detroit Free Press, "Affirmative action debate a good start," by Brian Dickerson.
  
  
• 1/22/2004, USA Today, "Editorial: 'Legacy' admissions ban highlights flaws in system," by Samuel G. Freedman.
  
  
• 1/20/2004, The Houston Chronicle, "Top 10 law not curbing college choices," by Todd Ackerman.
  
  
• 1/18/2004, Associated Press, "Admissions issue on exhibit," by The Associated Press.
  
  
• 1/16/2004, Detroit Free Press, "Editorial: Taking on affirmative action," by Barbara J. Grutter.
  
  
• 2/15/2004, Detroit News, "Court case causes U-M admissions fallout," by Thomas Bray.
  
  
• 2/15/2004, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, "Editorial: Don't Derail Diversity," by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 1/14/2004, Ann Arbor News, "Foes of petition begin campaign," by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 1/14/2004, The Chronicle of Higher Ed., "Washington's Governor Proposes Amending '98 Ban to Allow Return of Race-Conscious College Admissions," by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 1/14/2004, Detroit Free Press, "Editorial: Affirmative Action," by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 1/14/2004, Detroit Free Press, "Coalition: Don't sign race ballot petitions," by Dawson Bell.
  
  
• 1/14/2004, Michigan Daily, "Proposal would ban legacy programs," by Aymar Jean.
  
  
• 1/14/2004, Michigan Daily, "Editorial: Waiting for Connerly (A play in three acts)," by Ari Paul.
  
  
• 1/13/2004, Detroit Free Press, "After U-M decision, plaintiff rejoins battle," by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 1/13/2004, Detroit Free Press, "Petitions started for affirmative action," by Dawson Bell.
  
  
• 1/13/2004, Detroit News, "Editorial: Drive to Ban Affirmative Action Reopens Wounds," by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 1/13/2004, Detroit News, "Affirmative action backers, foes clash," by Oralandar Brand-Williams.
  
  
• 1/13/2004, Michigan Daily, "Campaign begins for ballot initiative," by Ryan Vicko.
  
  
• 1/13/2004, Wall Street Journal, "No More Boost for 'Legacies' at Texas A&M University," by Daniel Golden.
  
  
• 1/13/2004, Ann Arbor News, "Amendment effort launched," by Patty Maher.
  
  
• 1/13/2004, Ann Arbor News, "Voters are next hurdle in battle over affirmative action," by Judy Putnam.
  
  
• 1/12/2004, Associated Press, "Woman who challenged U-M's admissions policy to lead ballot petition drive," by David Runk.
  
  
• 1/12/2004, Chronicle of Higher Education, "Texas A&M Ends Alumni-Based Preferences for Applicants, to Assure 'Consistency' in Admissions," by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 1/9/2004, Detroit News, "50 years later, school segregation persists," by Francis X. Donnelly.
  
  

Top of page

2003

• 12/25/2003, Houston Chronicle, "Rice to weigh race in admission," by Todd Ackerman.
  
  
• 12/8/2003, Michigan Daily, "New Coalition to challenge Connerly initiative," by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 12/5/2003, Detroit News, "Coalition fights race ballot drive," by Hark Hornbeck.
  
  
• 12/5/2003, Detroit Free Press, "Neither party wants vote on preferences," by Brian Dickerson.
  
  
• 12/3/2003, Detroit Free Press, "Affirmative action battle moves to Lansing," by Dawson Bell.
  
  
• 12/3/2003, Detroit Free Press, Applicants adjusting to U-M's admission changes," by Teresa Mask.
  
  
• 12/3/2003, Detroit Free Press, "Changes in the applications are slowly down processing," by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 12/3/2003, Michigan Daily, "Students put more time into new essays," by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 11/18/2003, New York Times, "In Rejecting Affirmative Action Case, Court also Exposes Conflict Among Justices," by Linda Greenhouse.
  
  
• 11/15/2003, Washington Post, "At Colleges, an Affirmative Reaction," by Michael Dobbs.
  
  
• 11/1/2003, Washington Post, "Republicans Investigate Judge in Michigan Case," by Charles Lane.
  
  
• 10/31/2003, Ann Arbor News, "U-M calls 'legacy' status minor factor," by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 10/29/2003, Detroit Free Press, "For U-M's applicants, a new write of passage," by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 9/14/2003, Charlotte Observer, “UNC sees ‘plus’ in affirmative-action ruling,” by Jack Betts.
  
  
• 8/31/2002, The Boston Herald, “Affirmative action fights college elitism,” by Howard Manly.
  
  
• 8/31/2002, Ann Arbor News, “Damage phase of U-M admission case in flux,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 8/31/2003, Detroit News, “U-M changes its admissions, but is money very well spent?” by Laura Berman.
  
  
• 8/30/2003, Ann Arbor News, “U-M’s new application wins mostly high marks,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Detroit Free Press, “New U-M policy is more diverse, more complex,” by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Detroit News, “Both sides in case vow to monitor minoritites,” by Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Los Angeles Times, “Michigan takes a new path to school diversity,” by David G. Savage.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, New York Times, “U of Michigan alter admissions use of race,” by Greg Winter.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Chicago Tribune, “Michigan joins ‘mainstream’,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Chicago Tribune, “School unveils new process for admission,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “U. of Michigan Will Use Application Essays to Help Enroll Diverse Undergraduate Class,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: “U-M Admissions,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Some skeptical of U-M changes,” by David Zeman.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Detroit News, “Nation examines new U-M policy,” by The Detroit News.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Detroit News, “U-M policy hailed, assailed,” by Oralandar Brand-Williams.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Detroit News, “University charts ‘human approach’,” by Christine MacDonald.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Michigan Daily, “New admissions policy unveiled,” by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Washington Times, “Michigan changes admissions process,” by Frank J. Murray.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, USA Today, “Michigan unveils admissions standards,” by Greg Toppo.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Washington Post, “U-Michigan Reveals New Policy,” by Robert E. Pierre.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Critics of U-M’s new admissions procedure say since race is still a factor, nothing has changed,” by Liz Cobbs, Geoff Larcom.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Here’s how the new process works,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Ann Arbor News, “The new U-M admission form,” by News Staff.
  
  
• 8/29/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Are you applying to U-M? Write on — and on and on,” by Geoff Larcom.
  
  
• 8/28/2003, Reuters, “Michigan Revamps ‘Unlawful’ Admissions Policy,” by Reuters.
  
  
• 8/28/2003, Associated Press, “New University of Michigan policy still considers race,” by the Associated Press.
  
  
• 8/28/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Diversity still important in new U-M process,” by Maryanne George, Tina Lam.
  
  
• 8/28/2003, Detroit News, “U-M to ask applicants about diversity and finances,” by Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 8/28/2003, Associated Press, “U. of Michigan to unveil new undergraduate admissions policy,” by Sarah Freeman.
  
  
• 8/28/2003, Chicago Tribune, “Michigan applicants to pen diversity essay,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 8/28/2003, Ann Arbor News, “U-M to give applicants new level of scrutiny,” by Geoff Larcom.
  
  
• 8/28/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Students express diverse views of U-M’s affirmative action role,” by the News Staff.
  
  
• 8/28/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Admission to U-M remains a hot ticket,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 8/27/2003, Detroit Free Press, “U-M to rely more on essays,” by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 8/26/2003, Detroit News, “U-M readies new admissions plan,” by Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 8/26/2003, Fox News, “Race-Based Policies Raise Fraud Questions,” by Kelley Beaucar Viahos.
  
  
• 8/25/2003, Crain’s Detroit Business, “High court won’t reconsider UM affirmative-action ruling,” by Bloomberg News.
  
  
• 8/14/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, Editorial: “Ending Affirmative Action: 25 Years to Go,” by Dr. Charles V. Willie.
  
  
• 8/11/2003, Detroit News, “Michigan ballot drive faces tough fight,” by Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 8/8/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Are landmark court decisions all that important?” by Michael Klarman.
  
  
• 8/5/2003, Detroit News, "DeVos is right on affirmative action vote," by George Weeks.
  
  
• 8/3/2003, New York Times, “Affirmative action foe’s latest aim complicates California recall vote,” by Dean E. Murphy.
  
  
• 8/1/2003, Washington Post, “Court dispute in affirmative action case ruled moot,” by Charles Lane.
  
  
• 8/1/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, Editorial: “Open the ‘Black Box’ of college admissions,” by Marvin Krislov.
  
  
• 7/31/2003, Associated Press, “Dispute ends over affirmative action case,” by The Associated Press.
  
  
• 7/31/2003, Ann Arbor News, “College battles on race shifting,” by Judy Lin.
  
  
• 7/30/2003, Wall Street Journal, “Most disagree with high-court on affirmative-action ruling,” by WSJ Online Roundup.
  
  
• 7/28/2003, Michigan Daily, “MI legislators join Connerly in support of state initiative,” by Soojung Chang.
  
  
• 7/28/2003, National Review, “’Diversity’ …D’oh!” by John J. Miller.
  
  
• 7/27/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Connerly takes fight to Michigan,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 7/25/2003, Lansing State Journal, Editorial: “Affirmative action,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 7/24/2002, Ann Arbor News, “Connerly continues push,” by Peter Luke.
  
  
• 7/24/2003, Detroit News, Editorial: “Race ballot measure would be divisive,” by Betsy DeVos.
  
  
• 7/24/2003, Lansing State Journal, “O’Connor’s expectation realistic?” by Fred Dunlap.
  
  
• 7/21/2003, U.S. News & World Report, “Racing to End Preferences,” by Rachel Hartigan Shea.
  
  
• 7/20/2003, Ann Arbor News, Letter: “Done right, affirmative action carries no stigma,” by Regina Mullen.
  
  
• 7/20/2003, Detroit News, “4 states may revive affirmative action,” by Katherine Hutt Scott.
  
  
• 7/19/2003, Ann Arbor News, “2 lawmakers get behind race initiative,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 7/18/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Affirmative-Action Fight is Renewed in the States,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 7/18/2003, Ann Arbor News, Letter: “Michigan doesn’t need California’s problems,” by Sylvia Hurtado.
  
  
• 7/18/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, Editorial: “Colleges Should Take No Comfort in the Supreme Courts Reprieve,” by Curt A. Levey.
  
  
• 7/18/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, Editorial: “The Court’s Pronouncements Are More Dramatic and Subtle Than the Headlines,” by Martin Michaelson.
  
  
• 7/17/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “College Leaders Discuss Ways of Preserving Affirmative Action,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 7/17/2003, Boston Globe, “College Leaders Share Affirmative Action Ideas at Harvard,” by Patrick Healy.
  
  
• 7/15/2003, Baltimore Sun, Editorial: “Community colleges’ diversity enhances learning,” by Irving Pressley McPhail.
  
  
• 7/14/2003, National Review, Editorial: “Racial Preferences,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 7/14/2003, Los Angeles Times, Editorial: “Connerly’s Trivial Pursuit,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 7/14/2003, Michigan Daily, “Connerly address draws opposition,” by Soojung Chang.
  
  
• 7/14/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Affirmative overreaction,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 7/14/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Off the deep end,” by Daniel Adams.
  
  
• 7/14/2003, U.S. News & World Report, “The Supremes’ sophistry,” by John Leo.
  
  
• 7/14/2003, Associated Press, “NAACP Urges Affirmative Action Policies,” by the Associated Press.
  
  
• 7/14/2003, Washington Times, “Editorial: Diversity and preferences,” by Frederick R. Lynch.
  
  
• 7/13/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Connerly plan must abide by Michigan law,” by Judy McGovern.
  
  
• 7/13/2003, Detroit News, “Don’t fear an anti-preferences initiative,” by Thomas Bray.
  
  
• 7/11/2003, Detroit News, “Connerly’s plan for affirmative action’s demise counts on voters,” by Pete Waldmeir.
  
  
• 7/11/2003, USA Today, “Affirmative action wins — temporarily,” by Julianne Malveaux.
  
  
• 7/11/2003, Ann Arbor News, Editorial: “Justices get personal in race ruling,” by Ellen Goodman.
  
  
• 7/10/2003, New York Times, “Ballot Measure Seen in Wake of Court Ruling,” by Karen W. Arenson.
  
  
• 7/10/2003, New York Times, “College Rating by U.S. News Will Now Skip a Key Factor,” by Jacques Steinberg.
  
  
• 7/10/2003, Lansing State Journal, Editorial: “Connerly’s plan,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 7/9/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Initiative is difficult,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 7/9/2003, Lansing State Journal, “Affirmative action gets closer to ballot,” by Chris Andrews.
  
  
• 7/9/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Activists must follow procedures to amend constitution,” by Geoff Larcom, Tracy Davis and Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 7/9/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Foes of Affirmative Action in Michigan Plan to Take Their Battle to the Ballot,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 7/9/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Anti-affirmative action initiative,” by Kim North Shine.
  
  
• 7/9/2003, Detroit Free Press, “New twist in U-M has polls tangled,” by Brian Dickerson.
  
  
• 7/9/2003, Detroit News, “Affirmative action backers vow to derail ballot drive,” by Kim Kozlowski.
  
  
• 7/9/2003, Oakland Tribune, “Connerly takes affirmative action fight to Michigan,” by Michelle Maitre.
  
  
• 7/8/2003, Detroit News, Editorial: “Go Home, Ward Connerly; Affirmative Action Vote Ill-Advised,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 7/8/2003, Los Angeles Times, “Bid to Export Prop. 209,” by Rebecca Trounson and Stuart Silverstein.
  
  
• 7/8/2003, Mercury News, “Connerly on Prowl in Michigan,” by L.A. Chung.
  
  
• 7/8/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: “Don’t block the healing,” by William Milliken.
  
  
• 7/8/2003, Chicago Tribune, “New battle on affirmative action,” by V. Dion Haynes.
  
  
• 7/8/2003, Associated Press, “Connerly wants Michigan voters to decide affirmative action issue,” by David Runk.
  
  
• 7/8/2003, Detroit News, “GOP shuns affirmative action vote,” by Joel Kurth.
  
  
• 7/7/2003, Time, “How much diversity do you want from me?” by Perry Bacon , Jr.
  
  
• 7/7/2003, Detroit News, “U-M ruling shows no end to racial preferences,” by Thomas Sowell.
  
  
• 7/7/2003, Business Week, “High Court Anxiety,” by Mike France.
  
  
• 7/7/2003, Business Week, “Diversity is about to get more elusive, not less,” by Mike France and William C. Symonds.
  
  
• 7/7/2003, Jet, “Supreme Court Upholds University of Michigan Affirmative Action,” by News Reports.
  
  
• 7/7/2003, Michigan Daily, “Avoiding the RACE question,” by Maria Sprow and Karen Schwartz.
  
  
• 7/7/2003, Michigan Daily, “Ward Connerly to speak at ‘U’, may lead state ballot initiative,” by Soojung Chang.
  
  
• 7/7/2003, Detroit News, “Anti-affirmative action side scored semantic coup,” by Luther Keith.
  
  
• 7/6/2003, Ann Arbor News, Editorial: “Affirmative action as servant,” by Thomas E. Weisskopf.
  
  
• 7/6/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Last thing GOP needs is affirmative action on 2004 ballot,” by Peter Luke.
  
  
• 7/6/2003, New York Times, “Heartfelt Words From the Rehnquist Court,” by Linda Greenhouse.
  
  
• 7/5/2003, Sacramento Bee, Editorial: “The court’s affirming action,” by Swanee Hunt.
  
  
• 7/5/2003, Washington Post, “Calif. Activist Seeks End To Identification by Race,” by Darryl Fears.
  
  
• 7/3/2003, ACE Newsletter, “U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Affirmative Action in University of Michigan Admissions Cases.”.
  
  
• 7/3/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Affirmative action foes here Tuesday,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 7/3/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, “Trick Words Hurt Affirmative Action,” by Dr. James B. Ewers, Jr.
  
  
• 7/3/2003, Chicago Sun-Times, Editorial: “Michigan ruling is a hollow victory,” by Morton Kondracke.
  
  
• 7/4/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “The Court Decides Anything Goes,” by Michael S. Grove.
  
  
• 7/4/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “The Cloudy Vision of a Race-Free America,” by Ward Connerly.
  
  
• 7/4/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Court Rulings May Open the Door for More Use of Race in Student Aid,” by Sara Hebel.
  
  
• 7/4/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Affirmative Action Survives, and So Does the Debate,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 7/4/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Student Activists Prepare for New Battles in Wake of Decision,” by Jeffrey R. Young.
  
  
• 7/4/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “The Court Decides Anything Goes,” by Michael S. Grove.
  
  
• 7/4/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “The Cloudy Vision of a Race-Free America,” by Ward Connerly.
  
  
• 7/4/2003, Washington Post, “Affirmative Action Opponents Preparing for a Ballot Battle,” by Dana Milbank.
  
  
• 7/3/2003, Detroit News, “Voters may decide affirmative action by Joel Kurth.
  
  
• 7/3/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “A Diverse Court,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 7/2/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Anti-affirmative action drive in spotlight,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 7/2/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: “U-M ruling foils racial progress,” by Ward Connerly.
  
  
• 7/2/2003, Detroit News, “Activist seeks to bar race preference,” by Gannett News Service.
  
  
• 7/2/2003, Lansing State Journal, “Affirmative action critic might seek ballot initiative,” by Katherine Hutt Scott.
  
  
• 7/2/2003, Washington Post, “Supreme Assault,” by Howard Kurtz.
  
  
• 7/1/2003, Chicago Sun-Times, Editorial: “Class, fairness issues transcend race,” by Jesse Jackson.
  
  
• 7/1/2003, Detroit News, Editorial: “Court rulings are setback for conservatives,” by Robert A. Sedler.
  
  
• 7/1/2003, New York Times, “In a momentous term, Justices remake the law, and the court,” by Linda Greenhouse.
  
  
• 7/1/2003, USA Today, “Thomas distorts Douglass Speech,” by DeWayne Wickham.
  
  
• 6/30/2003, Chicago Tribune, “Editorial: O’Connor takes it upon herself to rewrite the 14th amendment,” by Dennis Byrne.
  
  
• 6/30/2003, Detroit News, “Court ruling means closer eye is needed on admissions,” by Pete Waldmeir.
  
  
• 6/30/2003, Financial Times, “Legal route to a more level playing field,” by Sarah Murray.
  
  
• 6/30/2003, Michigan Daily, “LSA Dean discussed admissions changes for undergraduates,” by Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 6/30/2003, Michigan Daily, “Newly recommended Caminker discussed Law School policy,” by Soojung Chang.
  
  
• 6/30/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “New admissions criteria,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/30/2003, New York Times, Editorial: “One Man’s Opinion,” by Stanley Fish.
  
  
• 6/30/2003, Newsweek, “Not Just Black & White,” by Debra Rosenberg.
  
  
• 6/30/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “Camouflage for Quotas,” by Terence J. Pell.
  
  
• 6/30/2003, Washington Times, “Ruling on race likely to spur fight,” by Frank J. Murray.
  
  
• 6/30/2003, USA Today, Editorial: “High court role in our lives becomes more public,” by Tony Mauro.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Ann Arbor News, Editorial: “Rancor can diminish with new U-M policy,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Affirmative action’s reach quite limited,” by Sarah Kellogg.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Associated Press, “Rep. Ford Lauds Affirmative Action Ruling,” by The Associated Press.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Baltimore Sun, “A question of acceptance,” by Alec MacGillis.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Baltimore Sun, Editorial: “Elevating minorities,” by Freeman A. Hrabowski III.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Baltimore Sun, “Affirmative action? No, racial preference,” by Gergory Kane.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Boston Globe, Editorial: “Affirmed … For Now the Supreme Court’s Decision Made Affirmative Action Resoundingly Legal,” by Glenn C. Loury.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Boston Globe, “High Court’s Race Ruling Affects K-12,” by Anand Vaishnav.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Boston Globe, Editorial: “Supreme Court Rulings,” by Jeff Jacoby.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Detroit News, “Colleges could give race even more weight,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Detroit News, “U-M ruling is worst decision since Plessy,” by Thomas Bray.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Los Angeles Times, “Family Embodies Split on Affirmative Action,” by Richard B. Schmitt.
  
  
• 6/29/2003. Los Angeles Times, Editorial: “College Rulings Add Insult to Injury,” by Abigail Thernstrom.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, New York Times, “A Decision That Universities Can Relate To, “ by Nicholas Lemann.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, New York Times, “Fixing the Race Gap in 25 Years or Less,” by Steven A. Holmes and Greg Winter.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Sarasota Herald-Tribune, “Supreme Court ruled wisely on affirmative action,” by Ruth F. Young.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “Right Ruling, Wrong Reason,” by Larry Adelman.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “More Fleeting Than Favorable,” by Safiya McClinton.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “No Longer ‘We, the people’” by Martha Montelongo.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “A Moment as Big as ‘Brown,’ by Goodwin Liu.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Washington Post, “A Boost for Workplace Diversity,” by Amy Joyce.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “Diversity? That’s a New One,” by Peter Wood.
  
  
• 6/29/2003, Washington Times, Editorial: “Counting on diversity in court,” by Mark Steyn.
  
  
• 6/28/2003, Associated Press, “Lawyers disagree on whether there will be more affirmative action challenges,” by Dee-Ann Durbin.
  
  
• 6/28/2003, New York Times, Editorial: “Mr. Diversity,” by Bill Keller.
  
  
• 6/28/2003, New York Times, “Administration Lawyer Lauds Affirmative Action Ruling,” by John M. Broder.
  
  
• 6/28/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “Truth From Justice Ginsburg,” by Colbert I. King.
  
  
• 6/27/2003, Associated Press, “Group Wants Judge Punished for Race Case,” by The Associated Press.
  
  
• 6/27/2003, Boston Globe, Editorial: “Bush’s Jive Act on Campus Diversity,” by Derrick Z. Jackson.
  
  
• 6/27/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Handling of Michigan Affirmative-Action Case Roils Federal Appeals Court,” by CHE staff.
  
  
• 6/27/2003, Detroit Free Press, “U-M rulings reflect that racism is real,” by Leonard Pitts, Jr.
  
  
• 6/27/2003, Lansing State Journal, Editorial: “Court gets it right on race,” by Deborah Mathis.
  
  
• 6/27/2003, Michigan Front Page, “Split decision,” by Ken Coleman.
  
  
• 6/27/2003, Newsday, “O’ Conner Splits the Difference on Diversity,” by Clarence Page.
  
  
• 6/27/2003, Science, “Careful Use of Race is OK, High Court Tells Colleges,” by Constance Holden.
  
  
• 6/27/2003, Wall Street Journal, “40 Years After Rev. King’ s Speech Court Adds 25,” by Daniel Henninger.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Admissions fix won’ t be easy,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Chattanooga Times Free Press, Editorial: “Defying the Constitution,” by Lee Anderson.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “A Victory for Justice, and a Vindication,” by Nancy E Cantor.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Columbus Dispatch, Editorial: “Walking a Tightrope,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Detroit News, “King’s vision was an American anthem,” by Luther Keith.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Detroit News, “New law dean says justice missed the point in U-M dissent,” by Laura Berman.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Detroit News, “U-M rulings split nation on race matters,” by News Reports.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Diversity Inc, “Top Guns: Did Military’s Affirmative-Action Brief Influence Court’s Action?” by C. Stone Brown.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Hartford Courant, Editorial: “Affirmative Action Ruling Wasn’t About the Law,” by Laurence D. Cohen.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Newsday, Editorial: “Affirmative Action Shakes Up Academia,” by Valerie Burgher.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Newsday, Editorial: “How Dare Justice Thomas Dissent on This One,” by Sheryl McCarthy.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Toronto Star, Editorial: “An imperfect solution to a vexing problem,” by Haroon Siddiqui.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Wall Street Journal, Editorial: “Justice O’ Connor’ s Real World Wisdom,” by Albert R. Hunt.
  
  
• 6/26/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “Confused O’ Connor,” by Richard Cohen.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Public reaction to court’ s decisions are mixed, too,” by Janet Miller and Jo Collins Mathis.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Rulings also may benefit K-12 diversity,” by Ben Feller.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Associated Press, “Race Ruling Will Be Felt Beyond Colleges,” by the Associated Press.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, “Opinions on ruling are diverse,” by Janita Poe.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Editorial: “Court ruling affirms need to keep affirmative action,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The Baltimore Sun, Editorial: “Affirmative action battle has just begun,” by Steven Lubet.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The Boston Globe, Editorial: “What About the Bonus Points for Whites?” by Derrick Z. Jackson.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The Boston Globe, “States Eye Court’ s Race-Based Admissions Ruling,” by Bobby Caina Calvan.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Business Week Online, “The Prescription for Admissions,” by Jennifer Merritt.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Chicago Sun-Times, “In wake of ruling, UIC reviewing med school’ s point-based admission,” by Dave Newbert.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The Christian Science Monitor, “Admissions shifting well before ruling,” by Mark Clayton.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The Christian Science Monitor, Editorial: “An Affirming Court Ruling,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The Christian Science Monitor, Editorial: “The hues of affirmative action,” by Trevor Corson.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Detroit Free Press, “U-M working on new policy for admission,” by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Black activist wants voters to decide issues,” by Kim North Shine.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Demand for change needs affirming,” by Rochelle Riley.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Detroit News, “U-M ruling creates motto,” by Thomas Bray.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Detroit News, “Reaffirming the value of the individual is the crux of rulings,” by Daniel Howes.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Detroit News, “Court decision shows that one size does not fit all in America,” by Pete Waldmir.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Detroit News, “Race ruling trickles down,” by Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The Guardian, “When America talks about race, all of us need to listen,” by Martin Kettle.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The Herald-Sun, Editorial: “Court draws fine line on admissions,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Lansing State Journal, Editorial: “U-M case,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Lansing State Journal, Editorial: “U-M critics,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Los Angeles Times, “At High Court, How They Rule is a Matter of Opinion,” by David G. Savage.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The Michigan Chronicle, “High Court upholds affirmative Action,” by Leah V. Harris and Patrick Keating.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, New York Times, “Impact on Universities Will Range From None to a Lot,” by Karen W. Arenson.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, New York Times, “Group Vows to Monitor Academia’ s Responses,” by Diana Jean Schemo.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, New York Times, “Context and the Court,” by Linda Greenhouse.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, New York Times, Editorial: “Could Thomas Be Right?” by Maureen Dowd.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Editorial: “A Lesson in Diversity,” by Jane Eisner.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Sacramento Bee, Editorial: “Back to Bakke,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Sacramento Bee, Editorial: “Affirmative Action,” by Peter Schrag.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The San Francisco Chronicle, “Decision keeps affirmative action in closet, analysts say,” by Bob Egelko.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, USA Today, Editorial: “Next step on affirmative action? Base it on income,” by Samuel G. Freedman.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Wall Street Journal, “Does a White Mother Add Diversity?” by June Kronholz.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Wall Street Journal, Editorial: “Winks, Nods and Preferences,” by Lino A. Graglia.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Washington Post, “In Court’ s Ruling, a Nod to Notion of a Broader Elite,” by Charles Lane.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “Want Diversity? Think Fuzzy,” by Michael Kinsley.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Washington Post, “A Ruling Not Entirely of This Reality,” by Courtland Milloy.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Washington Post, “U-Mich. Rulings Spur Strategic Scramble,” by Michael A. Fletcher, Lee Hockstader.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Washington Times, Editorial: “Quotas with tenure,” by Terry Eastland.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, The Washington Times, Editorial: “Bad law on preferences,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Washington Times, Editorial: “Trumping the Constitution,” by Paul Craig Roberts.
  
  
• 6/25/2003, Washington Times, “Justice: 25 years holds potential for more lawsuits,” by Frank J. Murray.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Court ruling draws applause across much of U-M campus,” by Janet Miller.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Plaintiffs’ damages may be years in coming,” by Liz Cobbs and Geoff Larcom.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Court ‘ mends it,’ but the end may be coming,” by Jonathan Tilove.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Law school system to serve as model,” by Geoff Larcom.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Individuality plays key role,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Ann Arbor News, “U-M Decisions to clarify, chart future use of race,” by Sarah Kellogg.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Ann Arbor News, “O’Connor makes a difference,” by Timothy M. Phelps.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Associated Press, “Mich. Starts Work on Admissions Policy,” by Tarek El-Tablawy.
  
  
• 6/24/2003,The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Editorial: “Ruling keeps water muddy on diversity,” by Jim Wooten.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, The Atlanta-Journal Constitution, “Colleges can use race as a factor,” by Steve Lash.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, The Atlanta-Journal Constitution, “UGA may rethink its policy,” by Kelly Simmons, Andrea Jones.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, The Boston Globe, Editorial: “Back to Bakke,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, The Boston Globe, “Race in Admissions Upheld Court Allows Use by Schools as One Factor,” by Lyle Denniston.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, The Boston Globe, “Some Colleges Must Adjust Procedures,” by Patrick Healy.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Boston Herald, Editorial: “Cheers for a split verdict,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Chicago Tribune, “Admissions changes not likely,” by Robert Becker.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, The Christian Science Monitor, “Evolution of affirmative action,” by Brad Knickerbocker.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Friends and Foes of Affirmative Action Claim Victory in Rulings on Michigan Cases,” By Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Decisions may prompt return of race-conscious admissions at some colleges,” by Jeffrey Selingo.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Crain’s Detroit Business,“Foundation offers model for graduating minorities,” by Laura Bailey.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Crain’s Detroit Business,Editorial: “A solid foundation,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, The Denver Post, Editorial: “Court gives confusion the nod,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: “Racial Realities,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Reactions,” by News Reports.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit Free Press, “New Political Focus,” by James Juhnhenn, Tony Pugh.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Opportunity, diversity spark competitiveness,” by Desiree Cooper.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Q & A: Help for aspiring Wolverines and their parents,” by Dan Shine.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit Free Press, “O’Connor’s role pivotal in decision,” by Stephen Henderson.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit Free Press, “U-M hails top court’s support of race factor,” by David Zeman, Maryanne George.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Students unite in celebrations of court rulings on diversity,” by Shawn Windsor, Shabina S, Khatri.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Ruling satisfies the firms with role in case,” by Jocelyn Parker.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Higher education embraces ruling,” by Lisa Zagaroli.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Ex-president: Ruling rational,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Mixed ruling baffles student who filed suit,” by Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Defendants savor victory,” by Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Law applicant proud of fight, despite loss,” by Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Lead plaintiff celebrates,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Rejected students have little recourse against U-M,” by Brad Heath, Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, Editorial: ”A Diverse Campus Must Remain U-M’s priority,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “What do U-M court rulings mean?” by News Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Quotas are out and it proves America is a land of compromise,” by Laura Berman.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Diversity wins in U-M Supreme Court rulings,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “U-M hurries to craft new rules,” by Ron French.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Court’s ruling bows to history,” by Brad Heath.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Students at campus rallies cheer ‘victory for diversity,’” by Oralander Brand-Williams, Vanessa Clarke.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Civil rights groups pleased,” by Kim Kozlowski.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Businesses say diversity broadens the workplace,” by Jeff Plungis.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Democrats use court rulings to go after Bush,” by Deb Price.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Foes see slow erosion of racial preferences,” by Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Detroit News, “Military academics unsure how ruling affects them,” by Francis X. Donnelly.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Financial Times, “Affirmative Action on race upheld,” by James Politi, Patti Waldmeir.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Los Angeles Times, Editorial: “Negatives vs. Affirmatives,” by Jim Sleeper.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Los Angeles Times, “Decisions May Lead to More Lawsuits,” by Richard B. Schmidt, Justin Gest.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Los Angeles Times, “Court Affirms Use of Race in University Admissions,” by David G. Savage.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Los Angeles Times, “Day of Celebration in Michigan City at Center of Court Debate,” by Eric Slater.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Los Angeles Times, Editorial: “A Welcome Affirmation,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Los Angeles Times, Editorial: “A Ruling That Only Goldilocks Could Love,” by Jonathan Turley.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, The Miami Herald, “University of Michigan Law School policy upheld, but undergrad ‘quotas’ are rejected,” by Stephen Henderson.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Court makes first step, ‘U’ must follow through,” by Stephen MacGuidwin.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Re-Affirmation,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “The Students React,” by Samantha Woll, James Koivunen.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “‘U’s support from corporate ranks bolstered case in court,” by Rahwa Ghebre-Ab.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “Students divided over methods used to achieve diverse campus,” by Samantha Woll, James Koivunen.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “Split Decision,” by Tomislav Ladika, Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, ”’U’ wins in Law School decision,” by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “LSA told to alter numeric system,” by Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “Hearing decision, emotional Coleman proclaims victory,’ by Jennifer Misthal.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “’U’ regents prepare to revamp undergraduate admissions policies,” by Karen Schwartz.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “Coleman expects little difficulty in making new policy,” by Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “Faculty looks with questions, concerns to future use of race in admissions,” by Abdur Rahman Pasha, Karen Schwartz.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “Changes on the way for schools across nation,” by Jordan Schrader.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, ”Private, public schools analyze admissions to match court’s dictates,” by Andrew Kaplan.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “CIR claims win over preferences,” by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “Ex-military officials urged justices to uphold policies,” by Rahwa Ghebre-Ab.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “Politicians sound off about Supreme Court decisions,” by Dan Tredeau.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “Sum of decisions greater than their parts,” by Maria Sprow.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, “Conservatives claim victory in striking down quotas,” by Samantha Woll, James Koivunen.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: ”Yesterday’s victory is tomorrow’s challenge,” by Earl Lewis.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Racial diversity and the equal participation objective,” by Robert A. Sedler.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Court, civil rights movement not born yesterday,” by Aubrey Henretty.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Civil Rights victory!” by Agnes Aleobua, Kate Stenvig.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “A Win for Affirmative Action,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Minneapolis Star Tribune, Editorial: “Court agrees,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, New York Times, “An Admissions Guide,” by Jacques Steinberg.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, New York Times, “Diversity Still Crucial Issue at University, Students Say, by Monica Davey.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, New York Times, “Ruling Provides Relief, But Less Than Hoped,” by Greg Winter.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, New York Times, “Justices back Affirmative Action by 5 to 4, but Wider Vote Bans a Racial Point System,” by Linda Greenhouse.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, New York Times, “Companies See Ruling as a Way to Help Keep the Pipeline Open,” by Steven Greenhouse, Jonathan D. Glater.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Orlando Sentinel, Editorial: “Sensible Balance,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Orlando Sentinel, Editorial: “Race, Ethnicity Still Play a Critical Role in Nation’s Psyche,” by Myriam Marquez.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Philadelphia Inquirer, Editorial: “Ensure diversity by starting earlier,” by Jane Eisner.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Philadelphia Inquirer, Editorial: “The fight isn’t over,” by Acel Moore.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Editorial: “Back to Bakke,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Reuters, “Michigan Ruling May Mean More Work for Colleges,” by Justin Hyde.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, The San Francisco Chronicle, Editorial: “Justices affirm equal opportunity,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, USA Today, “Court upholds use of race in university admissions,” by Joan Biskupic, Mary Beth Marklein.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, USA Today, ”What happens next? Questions and answers on issue,” by Mary Beth Marklein.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, USA Today, Editorial: “Supreme Court bolsters vital goal of campus diversity,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, USA Today, “Employers hail ruling as victory for diversity,” by Stephanie Armour and Del Jones.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Wall Street Journal, “Corporate Goal: Ethnic Variety, Without Using Quota Systems,” by Matt Murray.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Wall Street Journal, “Formula-Free Diversity,” by Daniel Golden and Sholnn Freeman.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Wall Street Journal, “Court Preserves Affirmative Action,” by June Kronholz, Robert Tomsho and Daniel Golden.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Wall Street Journal, “Affirmative-Action Opponents Seek a Ban on Collection of Ethnic Data,” by Robert Tomsho.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Wall Street Journal, Editorial: “Supreme Court Quotas,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Washington Post, “Court Mirrors Public Opinion,” by David Von Drehle.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Washington Post, “Affirmative Action for Diversity is Upheld,” by Charles Lane.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Washington Post, “Decision Means Most Colleges Will Stay Course,” by Michael A. Fletcher.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “Reaffirmative Action,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “A Resounding Victory for Diversity on Campus,” by Lee C. Bollinger.
  
  
• 6/24/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “Crude Remedy for a Disappearing Problem,” by George F. Will.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, ABC News, “Michigan President Calls Court Ruling a Victory; Other Side Also Praises Decision,” by Associated Press.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Court splits over U-M admissions,” by Sarah Kellogg.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Associated Press, “Justices Pen Widely Varied Mich. Opinions,” by the Associated Press.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Associated Press, “Some big businesses applaud ruling,” by John Porretto.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Associated Press, “High Court Preserves Affirmative Action,” by Anne Gearan.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Associated Press, “College Officials Hail Court Decision,” by the Associated Press.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Supreme Court Upholds Affirmative Action in College Admissions,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Christian Science Monitor, “Race in admissions revised,” by Warren Richey.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Crain’ s Detroit Business, “UM goes 1-for-2 in high court’ s affirmative action rulings,” by Laura Bailey.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, CNN, “School officials, students react to Michigan rulings,” by News Reports.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, CNN, “Court’ s affirmative action decisions add fuel to political debate,” by Sean Loughlin.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Detroit News, “Higher ed braces for fallout of race ruling,” by Jodi S. Cohen and Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Los Angeles Times, “Court Gives Affirmative Action Qualified OK,” by James Gerstenzang.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Michigan Daily, “Supreme Court rules on ‘ U’ policies,” by Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, MSNBC, “Split decision on racial preferences,” by Tom Curry.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Newsweek, “Race-norming in Michigan,” by George F. Will.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Newsweek, “Upholding the Status Quo,” by Debra Rosenberg.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, New York Times, “Supreme Court Splits on Diversity Efforts at University of Michigan,” by David Stout.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, New York Times, "Split Ruling in Supreme Court on race and university admissions," by the Associated Press
  
  
• 6/23/2003, PBS NewsHour: Discussion of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action policies in higher education's public institutions with Jim Lehrer featuring four presidents at publicly funded state universities: Mary Sue Coleman, University of Michigan; Larry Faulkner, University of Texas; Daniel Mark Fogel, University of Vermont; and Kermit Hall, Utah State University, also editor-in-chief of the "Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court." (audio and full transcript).
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Reuters, “Top Court: University Admissions Can Use Race,” by James Vicini.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Time, “And the Winner is…Affirmative Action,” by Perry Bacon, Jr.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, USA Today, “Court Upholds Mich. Affirmative Action,” by Joan Biskupic and Mary Beth Marklein.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, Wall Street Journal, “High Court’s Ruling on Race Could Affect Business Hiring,” by June Kronholz, Robert Tomsho and Charles Forelle.
  
  
• 6/23/2003, The Washington Times, "Court Upholds Mich. Affirmative Action, by the News Staff
  
  
• 6/22/2003, Ann Arbor News, “’Compelling interest’ key in U-M court cases,” by Sarah Kellogg and Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 6/22/2003, Ann Arbor News, “U.S. power elite’s ruling,” by Jonathan Tilove.
  
  
• 6/21/2003, The Guardian Weekend, “A supreme showdown,” by Gary Younge.
  
  
• 6/20/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “The ‘ Silent Killer’ of Minority Enrollments,” by Jamilah Evelyn.
  
  
• 6/20/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “The Biggest Barrier to College Isn’ t Race,” by Kermit L. Hall.
  
  
• 6/20/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: “Universities too united on U-M diversity cases,” by Jonathan Zimmerman.
  
  
• 6/20/2003, Detroit News, Editorial: “U-M’s double standard hurts quest for inclusiveness,” by Terry Pell.
  
  
• 6/20/2003, Wall Street Journal, Editorial: “My Case,” by Lee C. Bollinger.
  
  
• 6/20/2003, Wall Street Journal, “Schools Find Ways to Achieve Diversity Without Key Tool,” by Daniel Golden.
  
  
• 6/19/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, “Class-Based Affirmative Action,” by Ronald Roach.
  
  
• 6/19/2003, National Review, Editorial: “Civil-Rights Showdown,” by Edward Blum.
  
  
• 6/18/2003, The Herald-Palladium, Editorial: “Justices must do the right thing in U-M affirmative action case,” by Todd Shurn.
  
  
• 6/18/2003, New York Times, “F.D.A. Backs Flu Vaccine Given by Mist, Not a Needle,” by Andrew Pollack.
  
  
• 6/18/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “Affirmative Ambiguity,” by Robert J. Samuelson.
  
  
• 6/17/2003, New York Times, “10 Decisions Remain for Supreme Court,” by Linda Greenhouse.
  
  
• 6/16/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Regardless of ruling, seek diversity,” by May E. Snowden.
  
  
• 6/16/2003, Des Moines Register, “Coleman stands behind affirmative action policies at Michigan,” by Madeline Jerousek.
  
  
• 6/16/2003, Des Moines Register, “Coleman stands behind affirmative action policies at Michigan,” by Madelaine Jerousek.
  
  
• 6/16/2003, Detroit News, “Corporate innovation in peril,” by Jodi Cohen.
  
  
• 6/16/2003, Detroit News, “Road to Supreme Court,” by Jodi Cohen.
  
  
• 6/16/2003, Detroit News, “Courts could lose trust, confidence of minorities,” by Jodi Cohen.
  
  
• 6/16/2003, Detroit News, “Native Americans fear less legal help from their peers,” by Francis X. Donnelly.
  
  
• 6/16/2003, Detroit News, “Cohesiveness of ranks at risk,” by Jodi Cohen.
  
  
• 6/16/2003, Detroit News, “Society may change course if affirmative action dies,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 6/16/2003, Michigan Daily, “Upcoming rulings to impact businesses,” by Tomisla Ladika.
  
  
• 6/15/2003, Akron Beacon Journal, “The color of their skin,” by Katie Byard.
  
  
• 6/15/2003, Ann Arbor News, Editorial: “Nation secure if U-M loses cases,” by Paul Rosenzweig.
  
  
• 6/15/2003, Ann Arbor News, Editorial: “Race, preferential treatment and U-M University’ s goal of diversity is correct, but policies are flawed,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 6/13/2003, Ann Arbor News, Editorial: “U-M cases affect national security,” by Carl Levin.
  
  
• 6/13/2003, Wall Street Journal, “Some Backers of Racial Preferences Take Diversity Rationale Further,” by Daniel Golden.
  
  
• 6/13/2003, Wall Street Journal, “Affirmative Action Ruling Could Impact Internships,” by June Kronholz.
  
  
• 6/12/2003, Ann Arbor News, Editorial: “Texas’ affirmative action alternative,” by Larry R. Faulkner.
  
  
• 6/12/2003, Washington Post, “Appeals Court’ s Feud in Mich. Case Grows” by Charles Lane.
  
  
• 6/11/2003, Ann Arbor News, Editorial: “Affirm importance of diversity,” by Arne Duncan.
  
  
• 6/11/2003, Wall Street Journal, Letter: “Diversity’ s Failures at University of Michigan,” by Chetly Zarko.
  
  
• 6/10/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: “Affirmative Action is a side issue,” by Abigail Thernstrom.
  
  
• 6/9/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Many Students Lack Exposure to Racial Mix,” by Peri Stone-Palmquist and Ann Schimke.
  
  
• 6/9/2003, Ann Arbor News, Editorial: “U-M’s admissions policy is racist,” by William J. Bennett.
  
  
• 6/9/2003, New York Times, Editorial: “Solving the Diversity Dilemma,” by Amy Ziebarth.
  
  
• 6/9/2003, Wall Street Journal, Letter: “Racial Diversity Report of 1994 wasn’ t ‘ Hidden’ ,” by Paul Courant.
  
  
• 6/8/2003, Ann Arbor News, Editorial, “Standards, reach make U-M excel,” by Richard W. Riley.
  
  
• 6/8/2003, Detroit News, “Social science shouldn’ t decide U-M case,” by Thomas Bray.
  
  
• 6/8/2003, St. Petersburg Times, Editorial: “Historically black colleges win when flagship schools lose,” by Bill Maxwell.
  
  
• 6/7/2003, New York Times, “Court Report Faults Chief Judge University Admissions Case,” by Adam Liptak.
  
  
• 6/7/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Judge says actions were proper in U-M admissions ruling,” by Gina Holland.
  
  
• 6/7/2003, Washington Post, “Judges Spar Over Affirmative Action,” by Charles Lane.
  
  
• 6/6/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Why Not a Remedy for Past Discrimination?,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 6/6/2003, Detroit News, “Judge’s misconduct cited in U-M case,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 6/6/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “For Asians, Affirmative Action Cuts Both Ways,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 6/5/2003, USA Today, “Career taught me value of diversity,” by John C. Tucker.
  
  
• 6/5/2003, Wall Street Journal, Editorial: “Guess Who’s Coming to Study,” by James F. Blumstein.
  
  
• 6/5/2003, Washington Times, Editorial: “Farewell to rights,” by Paul Craig Roberts.
  
  
• 6/5/2003, Associated Press, “Judge Reviewed in Affirmative Action Case,” by Gina Holland.
  
  
• 6/2/2003, Washington Post, “In Affirmative Action Cases, Stevens could be Sleeper,” by Charles Lane.
  
  
• 6/2/2003, The Modesto Bee, Editorial: “Affirmative Action; the tip of the iceberg,” by C.V. Allen.
  
  
• 6/2/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Deconstructing affirmative action,” by Aymar Jean.
  
  
• 6/1/2003, Commentary, “Diversity: The Invention of a concept,” by Chester Finn Jr.
  
  
• 6/1/2003, Commentary, “The Scandal of ‘Diversity’,” by Jonathan Kay.
  
  
• 6/1/2003, Richmond Times Dispatch, “An Issue of Equity, 25 Years Removed,” by Andrew Petkofsky.
  
  
• 6/1/2003, Latina, Editorial: “Social and Political Movements against Affirmative Action,” by Andrea Guerrero and Linda Chavez.
  
  
• 6/1/2003, New York Times, Editorial: “How I Learned to Love Quotas,” by Jeffrey Rosen.
  
  
• May 2003, Michigan Bar Journal, “An Economic Alternative to Affirmative Action,” by Chetly Zarko.
  
  
• 5/31/2003, New York Times, Editorial: “How the G.O.P. created affirmative action,” by Jack Bass.
  
  
• 5/30/2003, Washington Post, “High Court Nears Statement on Race Cases,” by Anne Gearan.
  
  
• 5/29/2003, Detroit News, Editorial: “U-M Hurts its Credibility by Hiding Research,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 5/28/2003, The Augusta Chronicle, Editorial: “Court should pull the plug on quotas,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 5/26/2003, Newsweek, “High Noon for ‘Diversity’,” by George F. Will.
  
  
• 5/23/2003, Ann Arbor News, “CIR says it ‘goofed’ in accusation against U-M,” by News Staff.
  
  
• 5/21/2003, Ann Arbor News, “U-M accused of hiding diversity report,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 5/20/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Minority programs modified,” by Steve Giegerich.
  
  
• 5/25/2003, Boston Globe, Editorial: “Preferences, based on legacy,” by Jeff Jacoby.
  
  
• 5/25/2003, Chicago Tribune, “A case for special cases,” by Meg McSherry Breslin.
  
  
• 5/19/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Skin Deep Diversity,” by Aymar Jean.
  
  
• 5/19/2003, New York Times, “A Relationship That’s Past Its Prime,” by Samuel G. Freedman.
  
  
• 5/16/2003, Wall Street Journal, Editorial: “The evidence of things not seen,” by Chetly Zarko.
  
  
• 5/16/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: “Don’t let Brown decision be in vain,” by Michael Myers.
  
  
• 5/15/2003, New York Review, "The Court and the University," by Ronald Dworkin.
  
  
• 5/14/2003, Wall Street Journal, “For Five Supreme Court Justices, Affirmative Action Isn’t Academic,” by Daniel Golden.
  
  
• 5/14/2003, Wall Street Journal, Editorial: “Diversity’s Stigma,” by Jason L. Riley.
  
  
• 5/11/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Still separate, still unequal,” by Rochelle Riley.
  
  
• 5/9/2003, Financial Times, “A legal history maker reserves judgment,” by Patti Waldmeir.
  
  
• 5/2/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, "Affirmative Action is Poor Public Policy," by Peter H. Schuck.
  
  
• 5/2/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, Letter: "Recent Study of Diversity is Flawed," by Stephen Raudenbush.
  
  
• 5/2/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, "Affirmative Action is Poor Public Policy," by Peter H. Schuck.
  
  
• 5/1/2003, Ann Arbor Observer, "Diversity through Mediocrity?" by News Reports.
  
  
• 5/1/2003, Black Enterprise, "The Other Affirmative Action," by Earl G. Graves, Sr.
  
  
• 4/29/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: "Professional diversity," by Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 4/29/2003, Michigan Daily, "Bollinger defends affirmative action and diversity in speech," by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 4/28/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Americans mixed on affirmative action," by Steve Giegerich.
  
  
• 4/24/2003, Ann Arbor News, Letter: "Analogy makes points about U-M's affirmative action policy," by Ciro Soto.
  
  
• 4/24/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, "Taking Supreme Action," by Ronald Roach.
  
  
• 4/24/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, "Effectively Addressing Issues of Race on Campus," by Douglas F. Challenger.
  
  
• 4/24/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, "The Health of the Nation: Why Affirmative Action Is Needed In Medical School Admissions," by Dr. Charles Terrell.
  
  
• 4/24/2003, Black Issues In Higher Education, "Education Department Highlights 'Race-Neutral' Admissions Initiatives," by Charles Dervarics.
  
  
• 4/24/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: "A door for women, minorities," by Mary Sanchez.
  
  
• 4/24/2003, Washington Post, "Our Education Obligations Extend Far Beyond Affirmative Action," by Karin Chenoweth.
  
  
• 4/22/2003, National Review Online, Editorial: "The Never-Ending Story," by Peter N. Kirsanow.
  
  
• 4/22/2003, Los Angeles Times, "Students argue case for affirmative action," by Matthew Chin.
  
  
• 4/21/2003, Ann Arbor News, Editorial: "U-M should look to alternative approaches to admissions process," by David J. Korotney.
  
  
• 4/20/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Should U-M lower its standards?" by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 4/19/2003, Washington Post, "Wider Fallout Seen From Race-Neutral Admissions," by Michael A. Fletcher.
  
  
• 4/16/2003, Michigan Daily, "Diversity leads to challenges, exchange of ideas in classroom," by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 4/16/2003, Michigan Daily, "Students question definition of diversity of student body," by Tomislav Ladika, Maria Sprow.
  
  
• 4/16/2003, Michigan Daily, "Court decision expected in mid-summer," by Tomislav Ladika, Abike Martins.
  
  
• 4/16/2003, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, "Debaters Argue Both Sides of Affirmative Action Issues," by Nate Guidry.
  
  
• 4/14/2003, Michigan Daily, Letter: "Some areas of University life diverse, integrated," by Cindy Chu.
  
  
• 4/13/2003, Ann Arbor News, "U-M admissions policy brought diversity gains," by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 4/13/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Some U-M students say self-segregation is campus reality," by Staff and Wire Reports.
  
  
• 4/13/2003, Ann Arbor News, Editorial: "We need to target class, not race," by Chetly Zarko.
  
  
• 4/13/2003, Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, "Affirmative action case will turn on O'Connor's vote," by Gregory Stanford.
  
  
• 4/13/2003, New York Times, "Where Race Matters," by Jodi Wilgoren.
  
  
• 4/14/2003, Newsweek, "Michigan's Day in Court," by Debra Rosenberg.
  
  
• 4/13/2003, New York Times, Letter: "Judge's Life Experience," by Marc Falkoff.
  
  
• 4/11/2003, Michigan Daily, "Krislov discusses future of 'U' lawsuits," by Rahwa Ghebre-Ab, Kate Wenzel.
  
  
• 4/10/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, "Expert Panels Lay Out Legal Framework for Michigan Case," by Ben Hammer.
  
  
• 4/10/2003, Los Angeles Times, "College Diversity Feared at Risk," by Peter Y. Hong.
  
  
• 4/9/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: "Skewed coverage," by News Staff.
  
  
• 4/9/2003, Oakland Tribune, "Experts in S.F. debate university admissions policy," by Michelle Maitre.
  
  
• 4/8/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, "Outcome of Michigan Cases Could Hamper Employment and Outreach Programs, Community Colleges Are Warned," by Jamilah Evelyn.
  
  
• 4/8/2003, The Guardian, "Quota, un-quota," by Joel Budd.
  
  
• 4/7/2003, Chicago Sun-Times, Editorial: "Affirmative action opens door to college for all," by Lynn Martin.
  
  
• 4/7/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Reconciling separate realities," by Geoff Larcom.
  
  
• 4/7/2003, Legal Times, "O'Connor on Center Stage at Argument," by Tony Mauro.
  
  
• 4/6/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Everyone likes it when affirmative action scores on the playing field," by Peter Luke.
  
  
• 4/6/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Judge by character, not color of skin," by Jennifer Barnett.
  
  
• 4/6/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Personal experience shows benefits of affirmative action are real," by David Broder.
  
  
• 4/6/2003, Ann Arbor News, Letter: "If U-M policy is rejected, solution must be found," by Cheryl Farmer.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Crowds gather for day in court," by Sarah Kellogg and Jo Collins Mathis.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Ann Arbor News, "2 sides confident but unwilling to predict," by Jo Collins Mathis.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Powerful hours overtake emotions at U.S. Supreme Court," by Liz Cobbs and Jo Collins Mathis.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Olson: Academy policies may violate Constitution," by Anne Gearan.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Justice's remarks intriguing," by Charles Lane.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Ann Arbor News, "U-M students rally in D.C.," by Jo Collins Mathis.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, The Boston Globe, "Test Case Before High Court," by Patrick Healy.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, "U.S. Supreme Court Hears Affirmative-Action Cases From Michigan; Questions Signal Cautious Approach," by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, "Thousands Rally for Affirmative Action as Justices Hear U. of Michigan Cases," by Will Potter.
  
  
• 4/6/2003, Detroit Free Press, "Color Factors," by Ron Dzwonkowski.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Detroit Free Press, "U-M dilemma is mirrored by the justices," by Stephen Henderson.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Detroit Free Press, "U-M case poses a fairness question," by News Staff.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Detroit Free Press, "Diversity activists at work on campus," by David Crum.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Detroit Free Press, "Policy Put to the Test," by Stephen Henderson and Maryanne George.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: "Affirmative Choice," by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Detroit News, "Options: End preferences or rewrite admission rules," by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Detroit News, "High court confronts race issue," by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Detroit News, "Military may play crucial roles in case," by Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Detroit News, "Justices may ask U-M to alter rules," by Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Detroit News, "Thousands march for affirmative action," by Lisa Zagaroli.
  
  
• 4/6/2003, Detroit News, Editorial: "West Point analogy is beside the point," by Thomas Bray.
  
  
• 4/6/2003, Lansing State Journal, Editorial: "U-M's rules," by Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 4/6/2003, The New Yorker, "The Thin Envelope," by Louis Menand.
  
  
• 4/6/2003, New York Times, "Pros, Cons and Don't Cares at the University of Michigan," by Greg Winter.
  
  
• 4/6/2003, New York Times, Editorial: "Why Justice O'Connor Could Be Affirmative Action's Savior," by Adam Cohen.
  
  
• 4/6/2003, Washington Post, "Diversity on Campus, And in the Newsroom," by David S. Broder.
  
  
• 4/5/2003, San Antonio Express-News, "1 justice may be the key to affirmative action," by Matt Flores.
  
  
• 4/5/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: "Scapegoat Syndrome," by Colbert I. King.
  
  
• 4/5/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: "Scapegoat Syndrome," by Colbert I. King.
  
  
• 4/5/2003, Washington Post, Letters: "Building a Better Student Body," by John Payton, William H. Gray III.
  
  
• 4/4/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Race-conscious effort scrutinized," by Liz Cobbs and Sarah Kellogg.
  
  
• 4/4/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, "Behind the Fight Over Race-Conscious Admissions," by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 4/4/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, "The Michigan Affirmative-Action Cases and the Solicitor General's Historical Role," by David Glenn.
  
  
• 4/4/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: "Diversity shouldn't come at the cost of discrimination," by Richard Cohen.
  
  
• 4/4/2003, The Journal News, Editorial: Why Michigan needs affirmative action," by Roger Witherspoon.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Michigan Daily, "Diverse group of supporters organize Washington rallies," by Andrew Kaplan and Emily Kraack.
  
  
• 4/4/2003, Washington Post, "Diversity Benefits All Kinds," by Donna Britt.
  
  
• 4/3/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Experts: Military may be influence in court ruling," by Geoff Larcom and Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 4/3/2003, Detroit Free Press, "Military academy admissions may be key to U-M case," by Shawn Windsor and David Zeman.
  
  
• 4/3/2003, Detroit Free Press, "Ride on bus jogs protest memories," by Sheryl James.
  
  
• 4/3/2003, Detroit News, Editorial: "Court Ruling Should Reflect Nation's Values on Race," by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 4/3/2003, Detroit Free Press, "Firms don't support spreading U-M policy," by Jocelyn Parker.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Lansing State Journal, "Thousands turn out to support U-M policy," by Katherine Hutt Scott.
  
  
• 4/3/003, Michigan Daily, "'U' has months to wait before decision," by Maria Sprow.
  
  
• 4/3/2003, Michigan Daily, "Bollinger addresses Court's say," by Andrew Kaplan.
  
  
• 4/3/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: "My oh my, Antonin," by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 4/3/2003, Newsday, Editorial: "About Race," by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Chicago Tribune, "Justices hear Michigan case," by Jan Crawford Greenburg.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Los Angeles Times, "Justices Hear Affirmative Action Cases," by David G. Savage.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Financial Times, "Protests as US justices struggle on race issues," by Patti Waldmeir.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Detroit News, "Spectators get creative in effort to hear U-M case," by Detroit News Staff.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Detroit News, "Excerpts from U-M case," by Detroit News Staff.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Michigan Daily, "The final arguments," by Jeremy Berkowitz and Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Michigan Daily, "Hoping to sway court, students convene in D.C. by the busload," by Andrew Kaplan and Emily Kraack.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Michigan Daily, "Kennedy calls LSA policy a quota system," by Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Michigan Daily, "Justices question application of Bakke in Law School case," by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Michigan Daily, "Legislators find way to court step for hearing," by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Michigan Daily, "Universities look for alternatives to race-conscious admissions policies," by Associated Press.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Newsday, "College Applicants Search for 'Hook'," by Tina Susman.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, New York Times, "Court Considers Use of Race in Admissions," by the Associated Press.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, New York Times, "On Affirmative Action, High Court Seeks Nuance," by Linda Greenhouse.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, New York Times, "Thousands of Students Gather to Support Admission Policies," by Greg Winter.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Editorial: "The Case is Submitted," by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, "Court Hears Challenge to Affirmative Action," by Ann McFeatters.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, The University Record, "University makes its case before the Supreme Court," by Julie Peterson and Anthony Collings.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Wall Street Journal, "Supreme Court Revisits College Racial Preferences," by June Kronholz.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Washington Post, "An Affirming Action," by Natalie Hopkinson.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Washington Post, "A Defense Team of Thousands," by Debbi Wilgoren and Manny Fernandez.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, Washington Post, "O'Conner Questions Foes of U-Michigan Policy," by Charles Lane.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, The Washington Times, "Affirmative-action supporters rally," by Patrick Badgley.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, The Washington Times, "Race case could affect admissions at military schools," by Frank J. Murray.
  
  
• 4/2/2003, USA Today, "Justices debate race, college admissions," by Joan Biskupic.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Ann Arbor News, "County split on admissions policy," by Peri Stone-Palmquist.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Black Enterprise, "Economic Divide in America," by Joyce Jones and Latif Lewis.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Chicago Tribune, "High court case reopens affirmative action debate," by Robert Becker and Ron Grossman.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, The Christian Science Monitor, "Mary Sue Coleman," by David T. Cook.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, The Christian Science Monitor, "One university's case for race," by Mark Clayton.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Detroit Free Press, Letters: "Should race be a factor at universities, or anywhere else," by Roderick D. Gillum, Richard Ozga and Walter Chavers.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Detroit News, "Should U-M admissions policy be upheld?: No," by Curt A. Levey.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Detroit News, "Should U-M admissions policy be upheld?: Yes," by Ellen Goodman.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Detroit News, "Thousands trek to D.C. for historic U-M case," by Jodi S. Cohen and Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Detroit Free Press, "U-M policy: Save, mend, end," by News Staff.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Detroit Free Press, "The attorneys," by News Staff.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Detroit Free Press, "People wait at court to get a seat to history," by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: "A Case for Diversity," by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Lansing State Journal, "Supreme Court hears U-M cases," by Katherine Hutt Scott.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Michigan Daily, "Not quite colorblind," by Peter Cuniffe.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Michigan Daily, "Plaintiffs discuss goals in bringing their case before the Supreme Court," by Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: "Moment of truth," by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Michigan Daily, "Lawsuits could conclude history of litigation on race," by Soojung Chang, Victoria Edwards and Andrew McCormack.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Newsday, "Diversity in Numbers," by Tom Brune.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, New York Times, Editorial: "Friends of Affirmative Action," by NYT Staff.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, New York Times, "Affirmative Action Case Goes Before Court," by The Associated Press.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, New York Times, "Affirmative Action Arguments Pile Up," by the Associated Press.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Reuters, "High Court to Weigh Racial Preferences Cases," by Reuters.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Reuters, "High Court to Weigh Racial Preferences Cases," by James Vicini.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, USA Today, "Methodology key to affirmative action case before high court," by Del Jones.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Wall Street Journal, Editorial: "Racial Quotas and the Establishment," by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Wall Street Journal, "Conservatives Need Not Apply," by John O. McGinnis and Matthew Schwartz.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Washington Post, "Rally Sets Stage on Affirmative Action Cases," by Petula Dvorak.
  
  
• 4/1/2003, Washington Post, "At U-Michigan, Minority Students Find Access-and Sense of Isolation," by Darryl Fears.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Los Angeles Times, "Justice to Reconsider Race in Admissions," by Peter Y. Hong.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Financial Times, "Vital ruling on way for US race relations," by Pattii Waldmeir.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Legal Times, Editorial: "An Admission on Race," by Evan P. Schultz.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Legal Times, Editorial: "With Friends Like These—The weight of 90-plus amicus briefs in the Michigan cases ought to influence the Court," by Leslie T. Thornton.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Ann Arbor News, "U-M students in line for court passes," by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Plaintiffs' wait nearly over," by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, The Baltimore Sun, "U. of Mich. case is crossroads for affirmative action policy," by Mike Adams.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, The Christian Science Monitor, "Court takes up racial preferences in landmark case," by Warren Richey.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, CNN, "Supreme Court to hear affirmative action arguments," by Bill Mears.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, CNN, "Gratz ready to make her case before high court," by Bill Mears.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: "U-M admissions policies should be left to educators," by Nanette Lee Reynolds.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Detroit Free Press, "Decision may emerge from middle," by Stephen Henderson.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Detroit Free Press, "A Primer," by Stephen Henderson.
  
  
• 3/312003, Lansing State Journal, "Affirmative action hearing spurs rally," by Becky Shink.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Legal Times, Editorial: "No More Chinese Need Apply," by Anthony K. Lee.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Michigan Daily, "Line forms on steps of Supreme Court," by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Michigan Daily, "Rejected students speak out on 'U' rationale for achieving diversity," by Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Michigan Daily, "'U' supporters stand by claims," by Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: "After trial, campus will need to reevaluate," by Johanna Hanink.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Michigan Daily, “’U’ officials, students of color discuss lawsuits, budget cuts,” by Carmen Johnson.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, Newsday, "Similar Pasts, Different Sides," by Tina Susman.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, New York Times, "Supreme Court to Affirmative Action Case," by The Associated Press.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, New York Times, Editorial: "Why the Supreme Court Needs to Visit Cass High School," by Adam Cohen.
  
  
• 3/31/2003, U.S. News & World Report, "What's The Place of Race?" by Rachel Hartigan Shea.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Austin American-Statesman, Editorial: "Affirmative action still the best way to achieve diversity," by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Austin American-Statesman, "Racial policy before high court," by Steve Lash.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Detroit News, "Michigan takes on the American public," by Thomas Bray.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Detroit News, "Judicial bias alleged in U-M case," by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Big-time lawyers for U-M's big case," by Sarah Kellogg.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, The Houston Chronicle, "10% perfect solution to college admissions," by Ron Nissimov.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Los Angeles Times, "Affirmative Action Case Splits Asian Americans," by David G. Savage.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, "Bush on right course in University of Michigan case," by Gregory Kane.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, "Lawsuit over affirmative action policies has many 'friends'," by Mark Helm.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, Editorial: "Military command benefits from college diversity," by Dennis C. Blair and Joe R. Reeder.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, "Don't fall for the claim of 'colorblind' admissions," by Barbra Miner.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, New York Times, "Attack on Colleges' Aid to Minorities Widens," by Greg Winter.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, New York Times, "The Nation: Affirmative Action," by Linda Greenhouse.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, "Supreme Court Could Chart Future of College Admissions," by Susan C. Thomson.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, "Universities Argue Diversity Makes School Better for All," by Bill Schackner.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, "Case Challenging U. of Michigan's Admissions Policy Reaches High Court," by Ann McFeatters.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Reuters, "Supreme Court to Hear Key Racial Preference Case," by Reuters.
  
  
• 3/30/2003, Washington Post, "At Boston U, 'Holistic' Admissions Venture Beyond Black and White," by Michael A. Fletcher.
  
  
• 3/29/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Affirmative Action Complicates Burden of Proof in Minority Success," by Jonathan Tilove.
  
  
• 3/29/2003, Ann Arbor News, "'Race-neutral' guide to enrollment released," by Ben Feller.
  
  
• 3/29/2003, Detroit Free Press, "U-M took a risk; a stellar career took root," by David Zeman.
  
  
• 3/29/2003, Detroit Free Press, "Buses to carry thousands to back affirmative action," by Sheryl James.
  
  
• 3/29/2003, Detroit News, "Self-segregation exists on campus at center of affirmative action case," by Mike Tyree.
  
  
• 3/29/2003, New York Times, Editorial: "Is Diversity Overrated?" by Stanley Rothman.
  
  
• 3/29/2003, New York Times, Editorial: "A Policy That Depends on Segregation," by Benjamin Forest.
  
  
• 3/29/2003, New York Times, Editorial: "Admissions (and Denials) of Responsibility," by Glenn C. Loury.
  
  
• 3/29/2003, New York Times, Editorial: "Race is Never Neutral," by Lawrence H. Summers and Laurence H. Tribe.
  
  
• 3/28/2003, Ann Arbor News, "Faculty silent on admissions," by Geoff Larcom.
  
  
• 3/28/2003, The Christian Science Monitor, Editorial: “A Jeffersonian take on affirmative action.” By Corey D.B. Walker.
  
  
• 3/28/2003, The Christian Science Monitor, Editorial: “Race and national security,” by Jerome Karabel.
  
  
• 3/28/2003, The Christian Science Monitor, “Affirmative action’s evolution,” by Warren Richey.
  
  
• 3/28/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Court to quickly provide U-M tape,” by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 3/28/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: “Where to draw the line?” by Peter Schwartz.
  
  
• 3/28/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: “Students benefit from multicultural experiences,” by Zach Seal.
  
  
• 3/28/2003, Detroit News, Editorial: “Should Supreme Court strike down U-M admissions policy (Yes),” by Matthew G. Davis.
  
  
• 3/28/2003, Detroit News, Editorial: “Should Supreme Court strike down U-M admissions policy (No),” by David Neumark.
  
  
• 3/28/2003, Michigan Daily, “High school students: ‘U’ lawsuits critical to education,” by Maria Sprow.
  
  
• 3/28/2003, Michigan Daily, “New group protests war, supports ‘U’ admissions,” by Carmen Johnson.
  
  
• 3/28/2003, Michigan Daily, “Diversity! Where?” by Hussain Rahim.
  
  
• 3/27/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, "Hundreds Rally in Support of Affirmative Action," by Staff & News Wire Reports.
  
  
• 3/27/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, "Affirmative Action Policies Gain Washington Boosters," by Charles Dervarics.
  
  
• 3/27/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Minority students argue a different view,” by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 3/27/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: “Racial preference, even if for good, open door to future abuse,” by John Hasnas.
  
  
• 3/27/2003, Detroit News, Editorial: “How affirmative action affects minorities,” by George Bornstein.
  
  
• 3/27/203, The Hartford Courant, Editorial: “Affirmative action can do only so much,” by Vivian B. Martin.
  
  
• 3/27/2003, Michigan Daily, “Letter asks ‘U’ to open activities to all students,” by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 3/27/2003, Michigan Daily, “Students prepare to voice views on lawsuits at Washington rallies,” by Jeremy Berkowitz. .
  
  
• 3/26/2003, The Baltimore Sun, “Bush diversity plan seeks good with negative,” by Mike Bowler.
  
  
• 3/26/2003, The Baltimore Sun, “Bush on right course in dispute involving affirmative action,” by Gregory Kane.
  
  
• 3/26/2003, Sarasota Herald-Tribune, “Harvard’s Bok sees need for preferences,” by Chad Binette.
  
  
• 3/26/2003, USA Today, “O’Conner could hold key to her great friend’s legacy,” by Joan Biskupic.
  
  
• 3/26/2003, USA Today, “Affirmative action faces another test,” by Mary Beth Marklein.
  
  
• 3/25/2003, Detroit Free Press, “U-M Admissions Cases: Professor is root of lawsuits,” by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 3/25/2003, Michigan Daily, "Student sentiment missing from 'U' admissions policies," by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 3/25/2003, The Seattle-Post Intelligencer, Editorial: “Don’t undo good done by affirmative action.” By Todd Nicholas.
  
  
• 3/24/2003, Detroit News, “Rejection dashed woman’s dream,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 3/24/2003, Detroit News, “Students settled for second choices,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 3/24/2003, Detroit News, ‘Three lives converge at U.S. Supreme Court,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 3/24/2003, Legal Times, "Court Watch," by Tony Mauro.
  
  
• 3/24/2003, Legal Times, "Win or Lose, Law Schools Already Considering Changes," by Tony Mauro.
  
  
• 3/23/3003, Ann Arbor News, “Intolerable injustice gave rise to affirmative action at U-M,” by Janet Miller.
  
  
• 3/23/2003, The Denver Post, Editorial: “Let’s begin a real dialog on race in higher ed,” by Jessica Park.
  
  
• 3/23/2003, Detroit News, “Rights lawyer in familiar territory,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 3/23/2003, Detroit News, “Ex-liberal takes on U-M policy,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 3/23/2003, Detroit News, “U-M litigator has winning record,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 3/23/2003, Detroit News, “O’Connor pivotal to U-M’s cases,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 3/23/2003, Times-Picayune, “Affirmative action fight rages at Michigan college,” by Steve Giegerich.
  
  
• 3/22/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “A Multicultural Military,” by Dennis C. Blair and Joe R. Reeder.
  
  
• 3/21/2003, Ann Arbor News, “U-M cost already $9 million,” by Janet Miller.
  
  
• 3/21/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, "In Michigan and Many Other States, 'Percent Plans' Could Undermine Diversity," by Sara Hebel.
  
  
• 3/20/2003, Lansing State Journal, Editorial: “U-M right to push diversity,” by David C. Hollister.
  
  
• 3/20/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Opposition to U-M too simplistic,” by Marianne Means.
  
  
• 3/20/2003, Michigan Daily, “Bakke decision scrutinized in CIR’s undergraduate brief,” by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 3/20/2003, New York Times, “Study Challenges Case for Diversity at Colleges,” by Greg Winter.
  
  
• 3/19/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: "GM backs its bottom line," by Brian T. Fitzpatrick.
  
  
• 3/19/2003, Detroit Free Press, Politics and principles collide," by David Seman.
  
  
• 3/19/2003, Michigan Daily, "Plaintiffs' brief only presents part of the story, 'U' lawyers say," by Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 3/19/2003, Washington Post, Letter: "Selective Support for Preferences," by William H. Gray.
  
  
• 3/18/2003, Ann Arbor News, "2 GOP regents mum on admissions policies at U-M," by Geoff Larcom.
  
  
• 3/18/2003, Detroit Free Press, "Admissions debate fierce by respectful," by Shawn Windsor.
  
  
• 3/18/2003, Michigan Daily, "CIR research shows race factor affects only median of applicants," by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 3/18/2003, USA Today, "Study questions educational benefits of campus diversity," by Mary Beth Marklein.
  
  
• 3/17/2003, Ann Arbor News, Editorial: "Policy unintentionally hurts," by Nat Hentoff.
  
  
• 3/17/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, "Study Questions Educational Benefits of Diversity, a Common Defense of Affirmative Action," by Jeffrey Selingo.
  
  
• 3/17/2003, The Durham Herald, "Michigan cases throw specter on other colleges' admissions," by Eric Ferreri.
  
  
• 3/17/2003, Michigan Daily, "BAMN rallies during O'Connor speech," by Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 3/17/2003, Time, “Avoiding Another Michigan,” by Terry Bacon Jr.
  
  
• 3/16/2003, Star Tribune, "The difference that divide one U of M from the other," by Lori Sturdevant.
  
  
• 3/15/2003, Detroit News, Editorial: "You can succeed in life without U-M degree," by George Cantor.
  
  
• 3/15/2003, Washington Post, "Asian-Americans Ponder Affirmative Action," by Deborah Kong.
  
  
• 3/14/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Political Patterns Evident in Participation in Affirmative-Action Lawsuits,” by CHE Staff.
  
  
• 3/14/2003, Michigan Daily, "Students question points granted to legacies, donors," by Victoria Edwards, Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 3/14/2003, Michigan Daily, "Socioeconomic factor disputed in admissions policy," by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 3/13/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, "State Attorney General Stops Ohio State's Plan to Back Michigan," by News Staff.
  
  
• 3/13/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, "Colleges Prepare for Possible End to Affirmative Action," by Cheryl D. Fields.
  
  
• 3/13/2003, The Christian Science Monitor, Editorial: “The true affirmative action,” by Debra Bruno.
  
  
• 3/13/2003, Detroit News, “The minority report,” by Luther Keith.
  
  
• 3/13/2003, Michigan Daily, “Socioeconomic factors used in ‘U’ admissions garner strong support,” by Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 3/12/2003, Ann Arbor News, Letter: “Whatever court decides, there’s a way into U-M,” by Jeff Duncan.
  
  
• 3/12/2003, Detroit Free Press, “U-M president says school gratified by support,” by Liz Austin.
  
  
• 3/12/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Active debate,” by News Staff.
  
  
• 3/12/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Students for ‘U,’” by News Staff.
  
  
• 3/11/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Intervenors: Important side won’t be heard,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 3/11/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Students can’t address Supreme Court in U-M case,” by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 3/11/2003, Detroit News, “Ruling bars minorities in U-M case,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 3/11/2003, Michigan Daily, “Student intervenors denied time to give oral arguments,” by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 3/10/2003, Ann Arbor News, “High court denies oral argument for student intervenors,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 3/10/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Business has bottom line in mind when backing affirmative action,” by Rick Haglund.
  
  
• 3/10/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Legacy Admissions Are Defensible, Because the Process Can’t Be ‘Fair,’ by Debra Thomas and Terry Shepard.
  
  
• 3/10/2003, Detroit News, Uneasy alliance backs U-M admissions case,” by Luther Keith.
  
  
• 3/10/2003, Detroit News, “College legacy rules lock out minorities, critics say,” by Margarita Bauza.
  
  
• 3/9/2003, Ann Arbor News, “The quota debate,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 3/9/2003, Grand Rapids Press, "Admissions Puzzle," by Liz Cobbs, Peri Stone-Palmquist.
  
  
• 3/7/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, "Why Race Preferences in Admissions Aren't the Answer," by Lino A. Graglia.
  
  
• 3/7/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, Editorial: “Why Race Preferences in Admissions Aren’t the Answer,” by Lino A. Graglia.
  
  
• 3/7/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, Letter: “Faculty Diversity and Affirmative Action,” by Bill Goggin.
  
  
• 3/7/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Editorial: Why Race Preferences in Admissions Aren’t the Answer,” by Lino A. Graglia.
  
  
• 3/7/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Poll Finds Wide Support for Bush’s Stance on University of Michigan Case,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 3/7/2003, New York Times, “Poll: Public Split on Affirmative Action,” by the Associated Press.
  
  
• 3/6/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Cartoon criticizing U-M allowed to stay,” by AA News Staff.
  
  
• 3/6/2003, Detroit News, “Students want say in U-M race case,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 3/6/2003, Michigan Daily, “Changed debate casts new light on Bakke decision,” by Maria Sprow.
  
  
• 3/6/2003, Michigan Daily, “Past year’s cases show unpredictable court,” by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 3/5/2003, The Boston Globe, “Are legacy college admissions racist?” by the Associated Press.
  
  
• 3/5/2003, Detroit News, Editorial: “U-M case ‘sobering’ to student,” by Kimberly Sams-Smith.
  
  
• 3/5/2003, Michigan Daily, “Fearing division, state House will not criticize ‘U’,” by Andrew McCormack.
  
  
• 3/5/2003, The Orlando Sentinel, “Affirmative action serves America well,” by Maria T. Padilla.
  
  
• 3/4/2003, Detroit News, “If affirmative action dies, what happens to social class preferences?” by Betty DeRamus.
  
  
• 3/4/2003, Michigan Daily, “O’Conner vote deemed critical to admissions cases,” by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 3/4/003, The Richmond-Times Dispatch, Editorial: “Affirmative Action Needs Definition,” by David Scoven.
  
  
• 3/42003, The San Francisco Chronicle, Editorial: The values we cheer,” by Joan Ryan.
  
  
• 3/3/2003, Detroit Jewish News, “Affirmative Action,” by Sharon Luckerman, .
  
  
• 3/3/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Let them intervene,” by News Staff.
  
  
• 3/3/2003, Michigan Daily, “Affirmative action supporters make plea, march in Detroit,” by Carmen Johnson.
  
  
• 3/3/2003, The Nation, Editorial: “Back to segregation,” by Gary Orfield and Susan E. Eaton.
  
  
• 3/3/2003, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Editorial: “End Affirmative Action and Bring On Real Education Reform,” by James Edwards.
  
  
• 3/3/2003, The Washington Times, “’Friends’ briefs set record in Michigan,” by Frank J. Murray.
  
  
• 3/2/2003, The Buffalo News, Editorial: “Opposition Lines up in Affirmative Action Case,” by Murray Light.
  
  
• 3/2/2003, The Boston Globe, “Pending Admissions Case Has Counselors Unfazed,” by Ben Casselman.
  
  
• 3/2/2003, The Columbus Dispatch, Editorial: “A Good Call,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 3/1/2003, Ann Arbor News, “U-M may lose time in court,” by Liz Cobbs, .
  
  
• 3/1/2003, The Columbus Dispatch, Editorial: “Affirmative Action Doesn’t Mean ‘Quota,’” by Anoa Changa.
  
  
• 3/1/2003, Detroit Free Press, Editorial: “U-M Case,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 3/1/2003, Lansing State Journal, “U-M case is called pivotal for diversity,” by Bree Fowler.
  
  
• 3/1/2003, News Bureau, "Michigan cases put diversity issue center," by Craig Chamberlain.
  
  
• 3/1/2003, Washington Post, Editorial: “Race Still Matters,” by Theodore M. Shaw.
  
  
• 2/28/2003, Chicago Tribune, Letter: “Programs that foster racial diversity,” by James W. Compton.
  
  
• 2/28/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Chewing Over Affirmative Action,” by Will Potter.
  
  
• 2/28/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Hundreds of groups back U. of Michigan on Affirmative Action,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 2/28/2003, Detroit Free Press, “U-M students go to high court for time,” by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 2/28/2003, Financial Times, “Truth about diversity,” by Patti Waldmeir.
  
  
• 2/28/2003, Los Angeles Times, “Race-based Policies Challenged,” by Stuart Silverstein.
  
  
• 2/28/2003, The San Francisco Chronicle, Editorial: “Affirmative action,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 2/27/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Student intervenors file brief in U-M case,” by News Staff.
  
  
• 2/27/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, “Living in a Post-Affirmative Action World,” by Ronald Roach.
  
  
• 2/27/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, “Taking Sides,” by Erik Lords.
  
  
• 2/27/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, “Replacing Race-Conscious Admissions Policies,” by Kendra Hamilton.
  
  
• 2/27/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, “Freedom of Inquiry Requires Diversity,” by Dr. Mac A. Steward.
  
  
• 2/26/2003, The Denver Post, Editorial: “In affirmative company,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 2/26/2003, Detroit News, House backs Bush on U-M admissions,” by Amy F. Bailey.
  
  
• 2/25/2003, Detroit Free Press, “High court will judge U-M success,” by Tom Walsh.
  
  
• 2/25/2003, Detroit Free Press, House may urge court to overturn U-M Policy,” by The Associated Press.
  
  
• 2/24/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Diversity term the crux of U-M cases,” by Sarah Kellogg.
  
  
• 2/24/2004, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Ohio State U. Was Blocked by State Attorney General From Backing U. of Michigan on Affirmative Action.”.
  
  
• 2/24/2003, The Black World Today, Editorial: “Whites Swim in Racial Preferences,” by Tim Wise.
  
  
• 2/24/2003, The Kalamazoo Gazette, Editorial: “End affirmative action, but help economically disadvantaged,” by Chetly Zarko.
  
  
• 2/24/2003, Lansing State Journal, “Experts say U-M ruling crucial,” by Katherine Hutt Scott.
  
  
• 2/24/2003, The Palm Beach Post, Editorial: “Admission Rules Have Some Give,” by Tom Blackburn.
  
  
• 2/23/2003, Ann Arbor News, “MSU approach more ‘holistic’ in admissions,” by Geoff Larcom.
  
  
• 2/23/2003, Ann Arbor News, “How to get admitted to U-M,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 2/23/2003, Detroit News, “Admissions race debate shifts,” by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 2/23/2003, New York Times, “Doctors, Soldiers and Others Weigh In on Campus Diversity,” by Diana Jean Schemo.
  
  
• 2/23/2003, New York Times, “3 See College Suit as a Way to Show They Belonged,” by Jacques Steinberg.
  
  
• 2/23/2003, The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Editorial: “The ‘Diversity’ Diversion,” by James Traub.
  
  
• 2/23/2003, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Editorial: “Brief to the point,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 2/23/2003, Washington Post, “A Dream Denied Leads Woman to Center of Suit,” by Anne Hull.
  
  
• 2/23/2003, The Washington Times, “Texas schools find new way to diversity,” by Steve Miller.
  
  
• 2/23/2003, The Washington Times, Editorial: “Affirmative mystique,” by Walter Williams.
  
  
• 2/21/2003, The Boston Globe, Editorial: “Diversity Defense,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 2/21/2003, The Columbus Dispatch, “Petro Won’t Sign Affirmative-Action Brief,” by Alice Thomas.
  
  
• 2/21/2003, New York Times, U. of Michigan Draws a New Type of Recruit,” by Diana Jean Schemo.
  
  
• 2/20/2003, Ann Arbor News, “U-M takes offensive in filings,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 2/20/2003, The Boston Globe, “12 Democratic Senators Defend Affirmative Action in Mich. Cases,” by Wayne Washington.
  
  
• 2/20/2003, Chicago Tribune, "Madigan joins in school race case," by John Chase and Robert Becker.
  
  
• 2/20/2003, Michigan Daily, "Former military officers seek to further diversity," by Jeremy Berkowitz.
  
  
• 2/20/2003, Michigan Daily, "Businesses files court briefs supporting 'U'" by Tomisalv Ladika.
  
  
• 2/20/2003, Rocky Mountain News, “’Giant step backwards’” by Rebecca Jones.
  
  
• 2/20/2003, San Jose Mercury News, “Colorblind colleges? We’re not there yet,” by Joe Rodriguez.
  
  
• 2/20/2003, Seattle-Post Intelligencer, “Lawyers press case for diversity in higher education,” by Sam Skolnik.
  
  
• 2/19/2003, Ann Arbor News, "U-M supporters get extra day to file affirmative action briefs," by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 2/19/2003, The Boston Globe, "Harvard Files Brief on Race Use," by Patrick Healy.
  
  
• 2/19/2003, Chicago Tribune, "Affirmative action get big-biz support," by T. Shawn Taylor.
  
  
• 2/19/2003, Detroit News, "U-M takes case to high court," by Jodi S. Cohen.
  
  
• 2/19/2003, Detroit News, "The way U-m achieves diversity, not the need to do so, really on trial," by Pete Waldmeir.
  
  
• 2/19/2003, Detroit Free Press, "Law, not big names, to sway U-M case ruling," by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 2/19/2003, The Hartford Courant, "State backs University of Michigan," by Robert A. Frahm.
  
  
• 2/19/2003, The Hartford Courant, Editorial: “Friends of Affirmative Action,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 2/19/2003, Los Angeles Times, "A 'Powerful Message' on Diversity," by David S. Savage.
  
  
• 2/19/2003, Michigan Daily, "'U' submits briefs to Supreme Court," by Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 2/19/2003, Michigan Daily, "Granholm brief argues colleges have discretion to shape policies," by Tomisla Ladika and Andrew McCormack.
  
  
• 2/19/2003, Michigan Daily, "MSA passes resolution supporting 'U' admissions policies," by Andrew Kaplan.
  
  
• 2/19/2003, New York Times, "U. of Mich. Filings Flood Supreme Court," by The Associated Press.
  
  
• 2/18/2003, Ann Arbor News, "U-M gets more support in court," by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 2/18/2003, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Editorial: “Our schools have much to tell Bush,” by Martha Ezzard.
  
  
• 2/18/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Dozens of Supreme Court Briefs Show Widespread Support for U. of Michigan’s Admissions Policies,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 2/18/2003, Financial Times, "Affirmative action backers prepare case," by Pattie Waldmeir.
  
  
• 2/17/2003, Associated Press, "Former military officers and other to file brief supporting Michigan," by Dee-Ann Durbin.
  
  
• 2/17/2003, New York Times, "Companies to Join Race Admissions Lawsuit," by Reuters.
  
  
• 2/17/2003, The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Editorial: “Bush benefited From ‘Affirmative Action For the Privileged,’” by Ari Melber.
  
  
• 2/17/2003, The Washington Times, "Gephardt backs race-based admissions," by Michael Kirkland.
  
  
• 2/16/2003, The Herald-Sun, Editorial: “Welcome to the therapeutic university,” by John Staddon.
  
  
• 2/16/2003, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, "Conflicting views from the University of Michigan," by Lynda Guydon Taylor.
  
  
• 2/15/2003, The News and Observer, "Law school backs Mich." by Jane Stancill.
  
  
• 2/15/2003, San Jose Mercury News, "Stanford to file brief in fight over affirmative action," by Kim Vo.
  
  
• 2/14/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Detroit Alone Favors U-M Policy,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 2/14/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Detroit Alone Favors U-M Policy,” by Liz Cobbs.
  
  
• 2/14/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Business Groups Submits Brief to Supreme Court in Michigan Case,” by Staff and Wire Reports.
  
  
• 2/14/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Business Groups Submits Brief to Supreme Court in Michigan Case,” by Staff and Wire Reports.
  
  
• 2/14/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Congressional Democrats Assail Bush’s Stance Against Affirmative Action in Michigan,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 2/14/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Congressional Democrats Assail Bush’s Stance Against Affirmative Action in Michigan,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 2/14/2003, Michigan Daily, “Profs Educate Campus on Race Issues,” by James Wahl.
  
  
• 2/14/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Cowardly Tiger,” by Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 2/14/2003, Michigan Daily, “Profs Educate Campus on Race Issues,” by James Wahl.
  
  
• 2/14/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “Cowardly Tiger,” by Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 2/14/2003, Newsday, Editorial: “Equality is the Issue in School Admissions,” by Sharon Rush.
  
  
• 2/14/2003, Newsday, Editorial: “Equality is the Issue in School Admissions,” by Sharon Rush.
  
  
• 2/13/2003, New York Times, “Briefs Filed in Affirmative Action Case,” by the Associated Press.
  
  
• 2/13/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, “The Art and Science of College Admissions,” by Julianne Malveaux.
  
  
• 2/13/2003, Black Issues in Higher Education, “Educators, Activists Criticize Bush’s Position on Affirmative Action,” by Charles Dervarics.
  
  
• 2/13/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Bush Administration Seeks More Active Role in Opposing Race-Conscious Admissions in Michigan,” by Peter Schmidt.
  
  
• 2/13/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Getting in at U-M,” by Maryanne George.
  
  
• 2/13/2003, Michigan Daily, Editorial: “The Lion-Hearted Sacrifice of Jennifer Gratz,” by John Honkala.
  
  
• 2/13/2003, Michigan Daily, “Statistics Show Only Few Hispanics Attend College,” by Soojung Chang.
  
  
• 2/12/2003, The Christian Science Monitor, “Affirmative Action, Texas Style, Stirs Criticism,” by Kris Axtman.
  
  
• 2/12/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Affirmative Action March Set in Detroit,” by M.L. Elrick.
  
  
• 2/12/2003, Detroit News, “Metro Leaders Rally for U-M Admissions Policy,” by Jodi Cohen.
  
  
• 2/12/2003, Michigan Daily, “Granholm Brief to Support ‘U’ Policies,” by Andrew McCormack.
  
  
• 2/12/2003, Morning Star, Editorial: “The Benefits are Affirmative,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 2/11/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Studies: U-M Has Stronger Diversity,” by Geoff Larcom.
  
  
• 2/11/2003, Ann Arbor News, “Coleman Describes U-M Policy as ‘nuanced,’” by Ted Roelofs.
  
  
• 2/11/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Percentage Admission Plans Fall Short as Substitutes for Affirmative Action, Harvard Reports Say,” by Sara Hebel.
  
  
• 2/11/2003, The Denver Post, “Points System not a Cure, but a Remedy,” by Angela Cortez.
  
  
• 2/11/2003, Detroit Free Press, “Military Has Good Advice for President on Diversity,” by the Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 2/11/2003, Kansas City Star, Editorial: “Select Outreach, Not Racial Preferences,” by E. Thomas McClanahan.
  
  
• 2/11/2003, Los Angeles Times, “Admissions Studies Find Flaws,” by Rebecca Trounson.
  
  
• 2/11/2003, New York Times, “Flaws Seen in Campus Policies Replacing Affirmative Action,” by Jacques Steinberg.
  
  
• 2/11/2003, South Bend Tribune, “No racial or ethnic point system at ND, but rate of legacy enrollment high,” by Margaret Fosmoe.
  
  
• 2/11/2003, Washington Post, “College ‘Percent’ Plans May Not Help Diversity,” by Michael A. Fletcher.
  
  
• 2/11/2003, Washington Post, “U-Michigan Gets Broad Support on Using Race,” by Charles Lane.
  
  
• 2/10/2003, Legal Times, Editorial: “Preferences by Any Other Name,” by Roger Clegg.
  
  
• 2/10/2003, The Nation, Editorial: “The ‘quota’ smokescreen,” by Lani Guinier.
  
  
• 2/10/2003, National Review, Editorial: “Negative Reaction,” by The Editorial Staff.
  
  
• 2/10/2003, New York Times, “Gov. to Back U of M Affirmative Action,” by the Associated Press.
  
  
• 2/10/2003, The Toledo Blade, “Does UM policy make the grade?” by Ryan E. Smith and Dale Emch.
  
  
• 2/10/2003, Wall Street Journal, Editorial: “Affirmative Action,” by Robert L. Bartley.
  
  
• 2/9/2003, The Black World Today, Editorial: “Let’s Reframe the Affirmative Action Debate on College Admissions,” by Dori J. Maynard.
  
  
• 2/8/2003, The Toledo Blade, “Dozens march in support of affirmative action,” by Ryan Smith.
  
  
• 2/7/2003, Ann Arbor News, “63% Oppose U-M Race Policy,” by Jim Irwin.
  
  
• 2/7/2003, Michigan Daily, “Prof diversity facilitated by ‘U’ programs,” by Tomislav Ladika.
  
  
• 2/7/2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Race-Sensitive Admissions: Back to Basics,” by Willia